Course record FYSM
FYSM 1000
First Year Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable37 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2022
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Karen Marie Auvinen 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cora Einterz Randall 11 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Elizabeth Anderman 33 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.85
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.89
Reflection4.35
Respect4.88
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.42
Questions4.78
Vicki Jean Grove 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Thora Brylowe 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Bonnie Judith Auslander 8 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Sean Daniel O'Rourke 11 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection2.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.10
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Murray William Cox 3 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Celine Dauverd 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Michela Ardizzoni 3 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.00
Respect3.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Cosetta Seno 3 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Atreyee Bhattacharya 11 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.97
Contribution4.97
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.95
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.95
Questions4.99
Kevin J. Krizek 3 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Catherine Kunce 4 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.30
Questions3.80
Lon D Abbott 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Peter Hale Molnar 6 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Nicole Suzanne Lovenduski 7 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge3.90
Questions4.30
Jessica Lynn Bett 2 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge2.50
Questions5.00
Hope Saska 2 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge2.50
Questions4.00
Karen Mg Auvinen 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cathy Comstock 39 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.63
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.26
Grading3.88
Reflection4.30
Respect4.46
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.45
Questions4.57
Brian Thomas Talbot 15 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
H C F Fredricksmeyer 3 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity2.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Adrian Shin 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.87
Connection5.00
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.98
Respect4.76
Creativity4.87
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.39
Questions4.98
Seema Sohi 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Galina Siarheichyk 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
John Richard Stevens 4 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Masano Yamashita 5 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Lauren Shizuko Faraone 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Carol Cleland 4 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading2.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.00
Anja K. Lange 3 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Samuel M Flaxman 6 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Christopher M Carruth 7 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Jennifer Ho 7 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
David Eric Meens 2 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Colette Perold 5 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Lauren Shizuko Stone 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.