Course record FREN
FREN 3100
Introduction to Critical Reading and Writing in French Literature
University of Colorado Boulder
122 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed recordElisabeth M. Bloomfield 39 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
39 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bloomfield vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+7.3
C
−4.9
D
same
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 2 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology3.79
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.60
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.45
Reflection4.80
Respect4.63
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.62
Questions4.61
Warren F Motte Jr. 32 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−3.0
C
−4.9
D
same
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Loredana Alina Van Nelson 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.58GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
5.3% withdrew · 1 of 19 enrolled.
Brian Dennis Quinn 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.44GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
4.8% withdrew · 1 of 21 enrolled.
Leah K Powers 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.28GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Alina Van Nelson 17 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.10
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Brian Dennis Valente-Quinn 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Warren Motte 22 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology2.69
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.73
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.65
Reflection4.72
Respect4.75
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.46
Challenge5.00
Questions4.75
Sandrine Florence Vandermarliere 4 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Aimee Kilbane 10 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.23
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.38
Reflection4.20
Respect4.82
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.55
Questions4.46
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.