Course record FREN
FREN 3010
Phonetics and Conversation: AI and Us
University of Colorado Boulder
248 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Florent Philippe Rethore 29 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rethore vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−2.8
C
−2.6
D
−0.4
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Danica Petrovska 43 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Petrovska vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−10.6
C
+3.3
D
−0.4
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 2 of 45 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.55
Reflection4.58
Respect4.89
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.68
Questions4.97
Sara Fischer 100 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fischer vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
−3.9
C
+3.0
D
+0.6
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.18
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.78
Reflection4.48
Respect4.98
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.53
Questions4.98
Loredana Alina Van Nelson 35 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nelson vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+6.1
C
−6.0
D
−0.4
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Leah K Powers 41 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Powers vs. the course average
A
−15.0
B
+17.3
C
−3.6
D
−0.4
F
+1.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 1 of 42 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.42
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.65
Reflection4.64
Respect4.99
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.63
Questions4.80
Alina Van Nelson 61 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.76
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.75
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.86
Questions4.85
Flo Rethore 34 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.64
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.57
Reflection4.65
Respect4.61
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.69
Questions4.86
Aimee Kilbane 5 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.