Course record FREN

FREN 2120

Second-Year French Grammar Review and Reading 2

University of Colorado Boulder

253 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Emily E Martin 67 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
73.1% A
20.9% B
4.5% C
0.0% D
1.5% F

67 letter grades

Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A +19.0
B −10.3
C −6.2
D −0.8
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 2 of 69 enrolled.

Sara Fischer 43 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
55.8% A
30.2% B
9.3% C
0.0% D
4.7% F

43 letter grades

Compare with the course
Fischer vs. the course average
A +1.7
B −1.0
C −1.4
D −0.8
F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 3 of 46 enrolled.

Loredana Alina Van Nelson 131 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
46.6% A
35.1% B
13.7% C
1.5% D
3.1% F

131 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nelson vs. the course average
A −7.6
B +3.9
C +3.1
D +0.7
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.5% withdrew · 2 of 133 enrolled.

Sandrine Florence Vandermarliere 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.78GPA
25.0% A
50.0% B
16.7% C
0.0% D
8.3% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

7.7% withdrew · 1 of 13 enrolled.

Alina Van Nelson 97 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

97 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.61
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.65
Reflection4.87
Respect4.99
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.94
Questions4.98
Leah Kiraly Sigle Holz 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Danica Petrovska 8 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Leah K Powers 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Flo Rethore 9 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Sophie Rose 8 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology3.32
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.21
Connection3.32
Contribution3.37
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.37
Reflection4.14
Respect3.39
Creativity3.39
Feedback4.14
Interaction3.39
Challenge5.00
Questions3.39
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.