Course record FREN
FREN 1050
Beginning French Review
University of Colorado Boulder
98 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score48/100
Mixed record
Julie Colette Catel 25 grades · 1 term 2.86GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Catel vs. the course average
A
−20.1
B
+10.4
C
+5.8
D
−1.0
F
+4.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.31
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.12
Reflection4.46
Respect4.98
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.41
Questions4.75
Emily E Martin 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.31
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.84
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions4.85
Kevin Medhi Jacques Drif 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.46GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.91 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Ismael Ichola 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.45GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
13.3% withdrew · 2 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Sandrine Florence Vandermarliere 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.02
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.29
Reflection4.29
Respect4.82
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.55
Questions4.62
Leah K Powers 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.06GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Laurie Ann Rech 18 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.47
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.95
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.93
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Lola Lacheze 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.57
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.85
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.