Course record FNCE
FNCE 4040
Derivative Securities
University of Colorado Boulder
2,255 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average
Daniel Gregory Brown 387 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
387 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
+0.3
C
−2.6
D
−1.0
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 4 of 391 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.68
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.64
Reflection4.59
Respect4.75
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.82
Questions4.64
Shaun William Davies 811 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
811 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davies vs. the course average
A
+5.1
B
−3.7
C
−0.4
D
−0.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 5 of 816 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
636 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.74
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.83
Reflection4.68
Respect4.76
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.77
Questions4.86
Diego Garcia 353 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
353 letter grades
Compare with the course
Garcia vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+3.1
C
+1.0
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 2 of 355 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
683 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.43
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.46
Reflection4.46
Respect4.48
Creativity4.22
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.52
Questions4.56
David Michael Gross 405 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
405 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gross vs. the course average
A
−0.4
B
−0.7
C
−0.2
D
+0.2
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 6 of 411 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.46
Connection4.65
Contribution3.88
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.50
Reflection4.33
Respect4.76
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.63
Questions4.67
Nathan Walcott 65 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walcott vs. the course average
A
−10.2
B
+10.3
C
−0.9
D
−1.2
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 4 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.90
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.90
Reflection4.15
Respect4.30
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.05
Questions4.05
Iulian Obreja 136 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Obreja vs. the course average
A
−10.8
B
+8.0
C
+2.1
D
+1.0
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 1 of 137 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.47
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.63
Reflection4.47
Respect4.83
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.67
Questions4.93
Arka Prava Bandyopadhyay 98 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
98 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bandyopadhyay vs. the course average
A
−20.5
B
+3.4
C
+8.2
D
+10.0
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 99 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.27
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.00
Reflection4.17
Respect4.65
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.76
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.25
Questions4.36
Andrea Buffa 2 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection4.50
Interaction4.50
Seoyeon Katie Moon 2 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution3.50
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction3.00
Boyan Han 15 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.80
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.26
Grading5.00
Reflection4.82
Respect4.67
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.