Course record FNCE
FNCE 3060
Estate Planning
University of Colorado Boulder
121 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Michelle Clara Thompson 37 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Thompson vs. the course average
A
+18.3
B
−18.0
C
−1.4
D
+1.9
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.80
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.60
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.56
Questions4.93
Kimberly Johnson Raemdonck 27 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Raemdonck vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
+12.5
C
−14.9
D
−0.8
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.70
Questions4.70
Gina M Weinberger 39 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
39 letter grades
Compare with the course
Weinberger vs. the course average
A
−17.7
B
+11.1
C
+8.2
D
−0.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.93 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Holly Meredith Vandehoef 18 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.09GPA
18 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 18 enrolled.
Holly Meredith Sutton 9 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Rikke Marie Liska 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Marlys Jyoti Nassau 9 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Alyssa C Do 10 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.40
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.80
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.70
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.