Course record FNCE

FNCE 2010

Quantitative Methods for Finance

University of Colorado Boulder

2,803 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score31/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Ellen Burnes 218 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
45.9% A
42.2% B
10.6% C
0.9% D
0.5% F

218 letter grades

Compare with the course
Burnes vs. the course average
A +10.2
B −0.4
C −6.9
D −1.5
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.5% withdrew · 1 of 219 enrolled.

Andrew Clark 74 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
37.8% A
48.6% B
12.2% C
1.4% D
0.0% F

74 letter grades

Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A +2.2
B +6.0
C −5.3
D −1.0
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

5.1% withdrew · 4 of 78 enrolled.

Iulian Obreja 526 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
33.5% A
49.2% B
15.6% C
1.7% D
0.0% F

526 letter grades

Compare with the course
Obreja vs. the course average
A −2.2
B +6.6
C −1.9
D −0.7
F −1.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 9 of 535 enrolled.

Daniel Gregory Brown 505 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
43.4% A
29.9% B
21.0% C
2.2% D
3.6% F

505 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A +7.7
B −12.7
C +3.5
D −0.2
F +1.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.2% withdrew · 22 of 527 enrolled.

Jeffrey C Merrell 616 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
33.8% A
43.7% B
18.8% C
1.9% D
1.8% F

616 letter grades

Compare with the course
Merrell vs. the course average
A −1.9
B +1.0
C +1.3
D −0.4
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 24 of 640 enrolled.

David Michael Gross 204 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
37.3% A
38.2% B
13.7% C
8.3% D
2.5% F

204 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gross vs. the course average
A +1.6
B −4.4
C −3.8
D +5.9
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.9% withdrew · 6 of 210 enrolled.

Peter J Mohr 340 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
26.2% A
47.9% B
25.0% C
0.3% D
0.6% F

340 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mohr vs. the course average
A −9.5
B +5.3
C +7.5
D −2.1
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 6 of 346 enrolled.

Nathan Walcott 320 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
32.2% A
45.9% B
12.8% C
4.4% D
4.7% F

320 letter grades

Compare with the course
Walcott vs. the course average
A −3.5
B +3.3
C −4.7
D +2.0
F +2.8

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 10 of 330 enrolled.

Arka Prava Bandyopadhyay 6 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Nicole Hunter 128 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

128 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.44
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.65
Reflection4.51
Respect4.65
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.63
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.