Course record ESBM
ESBM 3700
Entrepreneurial Environments
University of Colorado Boulder
953 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Tara O'Brien 124 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
124 letter grades
Compare with the course
O'Brien vs. the course average
A
+52.0
B
−42.1
C
−9.8
D
−0.7
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 3 of 127 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.77
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.01
Grading4.12
Reflection4.47
Respect4.46
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.12
Questions4.47
Alexandra C Loken 69 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Loken vs. the course average
A
+47.0
B
−34.7
C
−10.6
D
−1.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.95
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.35
Reflection4.75
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Leigh Heeter Fiske 38 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fiske vs. the course average
A
+7.4
B
+2.3
C
−8.0
D
−1.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.73
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.43
Reflection4.61
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.73
Ethan Poskanzer 174 grades · 1 term 3.11GPA
174 letter grades
Compare with the course
Poskanzer vs. the course average
A
−12.4
B
+9.7
C
+3.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 175 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
167 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.76
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.48
Reflection4.75
Respect4.76
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.71
Questions4.71
Xiaoshu Bei 195 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
195 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bei vs. the course average
A
−7.2
B
+2.0
C
+1.7
D
+3.1
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 2 of 197 enrolled.
Overall3.06 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology2.80
Synthesis3.17
Collaboration3.88
Connection3.39
Contribution3.52
Discussion3.47
Inclusivity3.06
Grading2.02
Reflection2.88
Respect4.00
Creativity3.27
Feedback2.37
Interaction3.86
Challenge2.94
Questions3.16
Sina Khoshsokhan 243 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
243 letter grades
Compare with the course
Khoshsokhan vs. the course average
A
−17.3
B
+14.0
C
+4.6
D
−1.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 4 of 247 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
136 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.85
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.06
Reflection4.61
Respect4.87
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.62
Questions4.75
Cynthia Lee Banks 91 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Banks vs. the course average
A
−23.5
B
+20.4
C
+3.7
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 4 of 95 enrolled.
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jae Young Cho 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.32GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
5.0% withdrew · 1 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Hugo Valentijn Leenders 8 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Ash Elganzoury 9 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.91
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.65
Reflection4.86
Respect4.16
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.86
Questions4.86
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.