Course record EPOD
EPOD 2100
Studio 1: Foundations of Environmental Products of Design
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable7 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed recordAzhar Ahmed Khan 32 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.27
Contribution4.12
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.33
Reflection3.89
Respect4.49
Creativity4.53
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.02
Questions3.99
Alexandra Mariel Coit Beach 12 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jared Arp 51 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.88
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.74
Reflection4.80
Respect4.71
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.80
Questions4.57
Dean Bacalzo 10 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Elena Sabinson 17 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
David Hemsi 8 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Natalie Prager 8 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.