Course record ENVS
ENVS 5100
Special Topics in Environmental Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable17 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score78/100
Strong
Mark S Squillace 29 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.96
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.90
Reflection4.88
Respect4.96
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.93
Questions4.91
Amanda R. Carrico 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.88
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.72
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Matthew Gerald Burgess 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
David Ciplet 11 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.18
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Roger A Pielke Jr. 8 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.16
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.69
Karen Bailey 24 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.91
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.82
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Julie Sexton 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Jason C Neff 3 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Phaedra Carmen Pezzullo 4 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Steven Miller 5 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.