Course record ENVS

ENVS 5100

Special Topics in Environmental Studies

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable17 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score78/100
Strong

Professors 17 of 17

Mark S Squillace 29 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.96
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.90
Reflection4.88
Respect4.96
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.93
Questions4.91
Amanda R. Carrico 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.88
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.72
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Matthew Gerald Burgess 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
David Ciplet 11 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.18
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Roger A Pielke Jr. 8 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.16
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.69
Karen Bailey 24 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.91
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.82
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Julie Sexton 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.65
Questions5.00
Jason C Neff 3 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Phaedra Carmen Pezzullo 4 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Steven Miller 5 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Daniel Forest Doak 15 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.69
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.84
Reflection4.65
Respect4.88
Creativity4.98
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Joanna E Lambert 6 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.72
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.72
Grading3.78
Reflection4.72
Respect4.72
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Lisa Dilling 9 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Sarah Rogers 2 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Zia Mehrabi 7 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Hillary M Rosner 10 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology3.39
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration3.39
Connection3.44
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.86
Grading3.30
Reflection4.95
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Joshua Henry Radoff 3 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.