Course record ENVS

ENVS 3140

Environmental Ethics

University of Colorado Boulder

158 grades42 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 42

Kelsi Macken Nagy 58 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
58.6% A
27.6% B
10.3% C
1.7% D
1.7% F

58 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nagy vs. the course average
A +6.1
B −5.3
C −1.0
D −0.2
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 59 enrolled.

Benjamin Slater Hale 81 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
39.5% A
43.2% B
13.6% C
2.5% D
1.2% F

81 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hale vs. the course average
A −13.0
B +10.3
C +2.2
D +0.6
F same

Difference in percentage points.

6.9% withdrew · 6 of 87 enrolled.

James Preston Andrew 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
89.5% A
5.3% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Martin Alberto Chamorro 35 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Alexander Ryan Beard 57 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.71
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.09
Reflection4.48
Respect4.75
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.25
Questions4.28
Beth A Johnson 37 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Daniel Sturgis 37 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Jayda Taylor 62 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.71
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.58
Reflection4.71
Respect4.88
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.56
Questions4.54
David A Youkey 121 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

121 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.95
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.50
Reflection4.82
Respect4.60
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Martin Ablerto Chamorro 35 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Show all 42 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.