Course record ENVS

ENVS 3140

Environmental Ethics

University of Colorado Boulder

158 grades42 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 42 of 42

Kelsi Macken Nagy 58 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
58.6% A
27.6% B
10.3% C
1.7% D
1.7% F

58 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nagy vs. the course average
A +6.1
B −5.3
C −1.0
D −0.2
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 59 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Benjamin Slater Hale 81 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
39.5% A
43.2% B
13.6% C
2.5% D
1.2% F

81 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hale vs. the course average
A −13.0
B +10.3
C +2.2
D +0.6
F same

Difference in percentage points.

6.9% withdrew · 6 of 87 enrolled.

Open full professor record
James Preston Andrew 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
89.5% A
5.3% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Open full professor record
Martin Alberto Chamorro 35 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Alexander Ryan Beard 57 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

57 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.38
Connection4.71
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.09
Reflection4.48
Respect4.75
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.73
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.25
Questions4.28
Open full professor record
Beth A Johnson 37 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Open full professor record
Daniel Sturgis 37 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Jayda Taylor 62 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

62 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.71
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.58
Reflection4.71
Respect4.88
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.56
Questions4.54
Open full professor record
David A Youkey 121 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

121 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.95
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.50
Reflection4.82
Respect4.60
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Martin Ablerto Chamorro 35 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.65
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
William Camden Hodge 20 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Open full professor record
Mark King Boespflug 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Evan Jaymes Frook 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Vodehnal Anne Carrie 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Carl Alan Huber 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.90
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Open full professor record
Javier Acevedo De La Torre 20 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Dj Arends 20 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Scott Andrew Hill 18 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Open full professor record
Maria Colvin 14 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.46
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.00
Reflection4.42
Respect4.62
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.78
Challenge4.39
Questions4.42
Open full professor record
Brandon Michael Price 16 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Open full professor record
Stephen Thomas Troy 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Corey Samuel William Sherman 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Benjamin Michael Kultgen 8 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Open full professor record
Shane Bodhi Melnitzer 168 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

168 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.77
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.31
Reflection4.68
Respect4.60
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.77
Questions4.54
Open full professor record
Marshall Jarrell 19 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Kris Lauridsen 18 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Open full professor record
Joseph Wilson 30 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration3.07
Connection4.89
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.06
Challenge4.98
Questions4.78
Open full professor record
Melanie Elizabeth Tate 7 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Stanley Matthew Stolte 12 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology2.28
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.02
Connection3.45
Contribution3.89
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.26
Reflection3.43
Respect3.19
Creativity3.27
Feedback2.75
Interaction4.19
Challenge3.43
Questions3.43
Open full professor record
Henry Campbell 12 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Joy Webb 12 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Open full professor record
Kyle Nathaneal York 9 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.78
Connection5.00
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.80
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions4.95
Open full professor record
Carrie Anne Vodehnal 48 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.43
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.78
Grading3.99
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.57
Questions4.54
Open full professor record
Tyler Porter 3 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.88
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.77
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.46
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.77
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Charlie Roberts 2 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Xingzhu Chen 4 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.30
Open full professor record
Tim Burkhardt 48 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

48 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.88
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.63
Reflection4.74
Respect4.90
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.84
Questions4.78
Open full professor record
Merily Salura 3 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.30
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Haley Brigitte Gill 3 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction2.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.00
Open full professor record
Owen Woods 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Open full professor record
Hunter Jin 4 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Open full professor record
Sionna Lynch 4 reported responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.30
Questions3.00
Open full professor record
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.