Course record ENVS

ENVS 3100

Topics in Applied Environmental Studies

University of Colorado Boulder

40 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score75/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 14

Daniel Forest Doak 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
84.2% A
15.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

19 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.

Roger A Pielke Jr. 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.81GPA
85.7% A
14.3% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

21 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Emily Nocito 37 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.87
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion3.93
Inclusivity4.26
Grading3.90
Reflection4.19
Respect4.22
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.04
Questions3.84
Tyler A Nuckols 14 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration2.91
Connection4.60
Contribution4.58
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.64
Reflection4.94
Respect4.42
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.01
Challenge4.34
Questions4.66
Michael Paul Pellegrino 6 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.85
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.08
Grading5.00
Reflection4.69
Respect5.00
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.69
Questions4.85
Caroline S Conzelman 12 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Claire Powers 11 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Amanda R. Carrico 8 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Ryan Elman Langendorf 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.73
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.83
Reflection4.57
Respect5.00
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.66
Questions4.96
Laura M Deluca 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show all 14 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.