Course record ENVS
ENVS 2000
Applied Ecology for Environmental Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
337 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average
Ryan Elman Langendorf 145 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
145 letter grades
Compare with the course
Langendorf vs. the course average
A
+23.2
B
−2.6
C
−18.2
D
−0.6
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 2 of 147 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.90
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.88
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.88
Questions4.90
Daniel Forest Doak 192 grades · 1 term 2.61GPA
192 letter grades
Compare with the course
Doak vs. the course average
A
−17.5
B
+1.9
C
+13.8
D
+0.5
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 11 of 203 enrolled.
Overall4.23 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.25
Connection4.52
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.74
Grading3.97
Reflection4.22
Respect4.62
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.22
Questions4.37
Michael Drake 25 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.67
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.50
Reflection4.93
Respect5.00
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.83
Questions4.90
Emily Beam 22 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.77
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.33
Reflection4.60
Respect4.63
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.67
Questions4.67
Ellen Waddle 30 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.87
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.83
Reflection4.93
Respect4.83
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.87
Questions4.97
Nirav Patel 90 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.72
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.52
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.60
Questions4.65
Christopher Quinn 30 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.47
Reflection4.47
Respect4.63
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.37
Questions4.67
Jasmine Coomber 24 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.33
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.27
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.