Course record ENVS
ENVS 1001
Introduction to Human Dimensions of Environmental Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
1,518 grades30 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average
Eve-Lyn Hinckley 216 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
216 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hinckley vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−4.3
C
−1.9
D
−1.8
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 7 of 223 enrolled.
Peter Newton 177 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
177 letter grades
Compare with the course
Newton vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
+4.3
C
−5.4
D
−1.9
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 4 of 181 enrolled.
Overall3.82 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.40
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Carrie Anne Vodehnal 173 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
173 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vodehnal vs. the course average
A
−0.4
B
+3.7
C
−3.4
D
−0.2
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 4 of 177 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
481 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.01
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.54
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.83
Reflection4.00
Respect4.45
Creativity4.01
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.86
Questions4.17
Steven Miller 764 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
764 letter grades
Compare with the course
Miller vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
+0.3
C
+0.5
D
+1.0
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 20 of 784 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
500 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.84
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.43
Reflection4.47
Respect4.69
Creativity4.44
Feedback3.69
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.32
Questions4.57
Matthew Gerald Burgess 177 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
177 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burgess vs. the course average
A
−8.5
B
−2.5
C
+9.9
D
+0.3
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 4 of 181 enrolled.
Overall3.69 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.30
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection3.80
Respect4.40
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.60
Questions3.80
Diana Dorman 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.30
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.10
Questions3.80
Margaret Leah Hegwood 36 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.73
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.43
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.35
Questions4.78
Emily Beam 31 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.65
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Molly Elizabeth Huber 18 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.75
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Jeremiah David Osborne-Gowey 35 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.25
Reflection4.35
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.