Course record ENVS
ENVS 1000
Introduction to Environmental Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
2,544 grades37 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Karen Bailey 1,046 grades · 1 term 3.03GPA
1,046 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
−1.3
C
−0.8
D
−1.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 36 of 1,082 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
506 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.84
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.43
Reflection4.60
Respect4.63
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.55
Questions4.71
Sharon Kay Collinge 594 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
594 letter grades
Compare with the course
Collinge vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+1.6
C
+0.7
D
−0.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 24 of 618 enrolled.
Overall4.04 / 5
111 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.70
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Zia Mehrabi 674 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
674 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mehrabi vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+0.8
C
−0.3
D
+1.3
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 17 of 691 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
349 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.70
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.08
Reflection4.36
Respect4.61
Creativity4.17
Feedback3.54
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.46
Questions4.36
Jason C Neff 196 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
196 letter grades
Compare with the course
Neff vs. the course average
A
−11.9
B
+2.0
C
+5.6
D
+4.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 5 of 201 enrolled.
Overall4.21 / 5
316 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.81
Connection4.74
Contribution3.92
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.09
Reflection4.34
Respect4.66
Creativity4.09
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.34
Questions4.20
Jeremiah David Osborne-Gowey 19 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.31GPA
19 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.83
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.14
Connection4.35
Contribution3.66
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.60
Reflection3.90
Respect4.05
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.39
Interaction3.55
Challenge4.16
Questions4.05
Diana Dorman 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
15 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.85
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.15
Questions4.80
Helen Levieux Wilson 58 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.88
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.56
Reflection4.75
Respect4.84
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Casey White 67 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.74
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.61
Reflection4.55
Respect4.76
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.43
Questions4.72
Stefania Mitova 31 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.88
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.88
Reflection4.68
Respect4.83
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.58
Questions4.93
Ricardo Simmonds 56 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.89
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.49
Reflection4.71
Respect4.84
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.71
Questions4.47
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.