Course record ENVM
ENVM 6101
Special Topics for Master of the Environment Program
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable18 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Anna Reznickova 2 reported responses —Eval / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Synthesis5.00
Christine Ageton 16 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection5.00
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.80
Reflection4.93
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.95
Christoph K Nicoletti 25 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.55
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.35
Reflection4.35
Respect4.45
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Kimberly L Kosmenko 23 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.85
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Gunars Platais 25 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.89
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.87
Grading3.76
Reflection4.62
Respect4.78
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.38
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.72
Questions4.74
Jonathan Koehn 11 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Susan Leach 11 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James Donnel 9 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.10
Questions5.00
Kurt Richard James 9 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.10
Grading3.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.20
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Stephanie Shwiff 5 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.