Course record ENVM
ENVM 6003
Capstone Project
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable26 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Kimberly L Kosmenko 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
William Andrew Shutkin 13 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.78
Contribution3.71
Discussion3.28
Inclusivity3.97
Grading2.71
Reflection3.53
Respect3.56
Creativity2.54
Feedback2.57
Interaction4.28
Challenge3.50
Questions3.00
Lydia Anne Dixon 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Taber Stark Edelman Ward 7 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.47
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.54
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Scott Gwozdz 3 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Michael Huisenga 2 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Gretel Follingstad 13 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology2.75
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.58
Contribution3.76
Discussion3.01
Inclusivity3.87
Grading2.03
Reflection3.69
Respect4.10
Creativity3.06
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.17
Challenge3.94
Questions2.79
Joshua Henry Radoff 18 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.95
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.12
Reflection4.46
Respect4.83
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.85
Questions4.00
Damien Thompson 10 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.98
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.20
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.94
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.69
Lydia Anne Lawhon 3 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.23
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.