Course record ENVM
ENVM 6003
Capstone Project
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable26 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Kimberly L Kosmenko 8 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
William Andrew Shutkin 13 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.78
Contribution3.71
Discussion3.28
Inclusivity3.97
Grading2.71
Reflection3.53
Respect3.56
Creativity2.54
Feedback2.57
Interaction4.28
Challenge3.50
Questions3.00
Lydia Anne Dixon 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Taber Stark Edelman Ward 7 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.47
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.54
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Scott Gwozdz 3 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Michael Huisenga 2 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Gretel Follingstad 13 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology2.75
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.58
Contribution3.76
Discussion3.01
Inclusivity3.87
Grading2.03
Reflection3.69
Respect4.10
Creativity3.06
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.17
Challenge3.94
Questions2.79
Joshua Henry Radoff 18 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.95
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.12
Reflection4.46
Respect4.83
Creativity3.93
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.85
Questions4.00
Damien Thompson 10 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.98
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.20
Reflection4.86
Respect4.96
Creativity4.94
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.69
Lydia Anne Lawhon 3 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.23
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.62
Questions5.00
Joel N Hartter 8 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.99
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity2.31
Grading3.68
Reflection4.95
Respect4.63
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.68
Questions4.81
Colleen Mary Scanlan Lyons 3 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions3.70
Nicole R Wobus 4 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Derek Bjorn Fehrer 7 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.92
Connection5.00
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.29
Reflection4.92
Respect4.46
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.54
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.54
Questions4.92
Jonathan Charles Asher 5 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.18
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.95
Grading2.80
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.82
Questions3.77
Devon Nicole Bertram 3 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Leslie E Blood 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.94
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.64
Grading5.00
Reflection4.94
Respect4.64
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.64
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.64
Questions4.28
Meghan Jane Mccarroll 23 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.94
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.98
Reflection4.85
Respect4.99
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.94
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Natalie Kooi Sim Ooi 6 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration3.35
Connection4.28
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.04
Reflection4.35
Respect4.77
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.05
Questions4.77
Gregor Allen Macgregor 19 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.50
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.36
Grading3.93
Reflection3.96
Respect4.62
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.38
Questions4.24
Anna Reznickova 5 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.97
Reflection5.00
Respect4.97
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mara Rose 6 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Karen Bailey 3 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.23
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.62
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Brian Paul Kennedy 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kelly Ann Lane 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Maria Mcdonald 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.