Course record ENVD
ENVD 1030
Studio 1: Introduction to Landscape Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable27 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Sara Tabatabaie 20 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.28
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.67
Reflection4.13
Respect4.31
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.29
Questions4.21
Jesse Peter Van Horne 19 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology2.95
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.01
Contribution3.41
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity3.63
Grading2.57
Reflection3.63
Respect3.63
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.11
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.24
Questions3.10
Danielle Melissa Bilot 27 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.21
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.72
Connection3.78
Contribution3.07
Discussion2.84
Inclusivity3.98
Grading3.41
Reflection3.66
Respect3.46
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.13
Interaction3.88
Challenge3.47
Questions3.05
Emily Rose Greenwood 30 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.86
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.42
Reflection4.89
Respect4.54
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Robin Lynn Rooney 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Christy Lee Rogers 16 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.68
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.44
Reflection4.44
Respect4.73
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.86
Questions4.34
Susannah Drake 4 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Magdalena A Aravena Gutierrez 5 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.91
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.09
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.91
Reflection4.09
Respect4.72
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.16
Questions4.16
Shane Fagan 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Scott Vangenderen 10 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology1.58
Synthesis3.16
Collaboration2.95
Connection3.02
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.41
Grading1.69
Reflection3.51
Respect4.06
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.06
Questions3.55
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.