Course record ENVD
ENVD 1030
Studio 1: Introduction to Landscape Architecture
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable27 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Sara Tabatabaie 20 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.28
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.67
Reflection4.13
Respect4.31
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.29
Questions4.21
Jesse Peter Van Horne 19 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology2.95
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.01
Contribution3.41
Discussion3.57
Inclusivity3.63
Grading2.57
Reflection3.63
Respect3.63
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.11
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.24
Questions3.10
Danielle Melissa Bilot 27 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.21
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.72
Connection3.78
Contribution3.07
Discussion2.84
Inclusivity3.98
Grading3.41
Reflection3.66
Respect3.46
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.13
Interaction3.88
Challenge3.47
Questions3.05
Emily Rose Greenwood 30 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.86
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.42
Reflection4.89
Respect4.54
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Robin Lynn Rooney 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Christy Lee Rogers 16 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology3.93
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.68
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.44
Reflection4.44
Respect4.73
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.86
Questions4.34
Susannah Drake 4 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Magdalena A Aravena Gutierrez 5 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.91
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.09
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.91
Reflection4.09
Respect4.72
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.16
Questions4.16
Shane Fagan 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Scott Vangenderen 10 reported responses 3.49Eval / 5
Overall3.49 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology1.58
Synthesis3.16
Collaboration2.95
Connection3.02
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.41
Grading1.69
Reflection3.51
Respect4.06
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.06
Questions3.55
F Siobhan M Brooks 6 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Nick Patin 8 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Dean Bacalzo 28 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.73
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.17
Reflection4.96
Respect4.73
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.87
Questions4.82
Nettie Skievaski 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mark Rukamathu 4 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions4.20
Zannah Matson 20 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Marianne Holbert 17 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Susan Amanda Massey 37 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology3.51
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.24
Connection3.67
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity3.64
Grading3.00
Reflection4.16
Respect4.13
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.56
Challenge3.89
Questions3.40
Shawhin Roudbari 35 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology3.67
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.42
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.44
Reflection4.52
Respect4.70
Creativity4.89
Feedback3.97
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.52
Questions4.52
Juan Grisales 9 reported responses 2.84Eval / 5
Overall2.84 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology2.60
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.10
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity2.70
Grading1.70
Reflection3.30
Respect3.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.60
Challenge2.90
Questions2.90
Martin Paddack 32 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.78
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.30
Reflection4.75
Respect4.83
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.70
Questions4.55
Virginia Ann Skartvedt 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Sophie Chien 15 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Andrew Richard Wollenberg 4 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.20
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Casey M Lindberg 4 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Elizabeth Isbell Smith 1 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ann Skartvedt 16 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.