Course record ENVD

ENVD 1022

Technology 3: Intermediate Applications for Environmental Design

University of Colorado Boulder

174 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score37/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 17

Sara Tabatabaie 174 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
52.9% A
42.5% B
3.4% C
1.1% D
0.0% F

174 letter grades

1.1% withdrew · 2 of 176 enrolled.

Alexandra Mariel Coit Beach 58 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.79
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.49
Grading4.57
Reflection4.14
Respect4.66
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.13
Questions4.51
William Thomas Currell 39 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.55
Connection3.75
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.18
Reflection3.85
Respect4.47
Creativity4.18
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.15
Questions4.13
Hanaan Othman Llewellyn 23 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.38
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.58
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity3.18
Grading3.60
Reflection3.45
Respect4.50
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.83
Questions3.98
Nettie Skievaski 18 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.65
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.85
Majed Saud Alghamdi 21 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.73
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.28
Reflection4.00
Respect4.45
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.22
Kate Malloy 18 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.34
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.54
Reflection4.76
Respect4.78
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.63
Questions4.81
Aiden Simpson 18 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.42
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.74
Grading3.74
Reflection4.30
Respect4.42
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.04
Questions4.35
Ryder Phelps 3 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Logan Shockey 10 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.38
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.47
Grading5.00
Reflection4.69
Respect5.00
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.84
Questions5.00
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.