Course record ENGL
ENGL 4206
Writing for the Real World
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Rachael Deagman Simonetta 35 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.59
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.66
Reflection4.63
Respect4.51
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.67
Questions4.73
Martin Bickman 14 reported responses 3.13Eval / 5
Overall3.13 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.41
Technology1.32
Synthesis2.51
Collaboration4.20
Connection2.81
Contribution3.61
Discussion3.61
Inclusivity2.51
Grading1.02
Reflection2.22
Respect2.01
Creativity2.02
Feedback1.12
Interaction3.61
Challenge2.01
Questions2.62
Jaquelin Pelzer 3 reported responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.70
Contribution2.70
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.70
Reflection3.30
Respect3.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.30
Questions2.30
Karim Mattar 3 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.30
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback2.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Jenny Cookson 3 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions3.70
Lilly Rothman 41 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.45
Reflection4.38
Respect4.97
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.63
Questions4.88
Jason Brandt Schaefer 12 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Lillian May Rothman 7 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Nicole M Wright 6 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.25
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.