Course record ENGL
ENGL 3830
Topics in Advanced Writing and Research
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong
Gabriela Rios 13 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.97
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.96
Reflection4.94
Respect4.98
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.95
Questions4.97
Michael Schrimper 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Jenny Cookson 8 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.68
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.18
Reflection5.00
Respect4.69
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.97
Questions4.97
Joan G Cooper 8 reported responses 2.75Eval / 5
Overall2.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology1.70
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.80
Connection2.20
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.00
Reflection2.50
Respect3.20
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.30
Challenge3.10
Questions2.20
Jane Marie Garrity 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.35
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.79
Reflection4.77
Respect4.81
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.86
Questions4.81
Judith L. Strathearn 13 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.59
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.96
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.59
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jaquetta Shade-Johnson 5 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Nisha Shanmugaraj 14 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
James Roland Carson 3 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.