Course record ENGL
ENGL 3310
The Bible as Literature
University of Colorado Boulder
122 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score62/100
Strong
Justin Michael Saxby 27 grades · 1 term 3.98GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Saxby vs. the course average
A
+32.0
B
−21.3
C
−9.0
D
−0.8
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.94
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.76
Reflection4.94
Respect4.96
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.69
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.94
Questions4.99
Sue Zemka 43 grades · 1 term 3.73GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zemka vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−5.0
C
−6.7
D
+1.5
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 44 enrolled.
Katherine C. Little 52 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
52 letter grades
Compare with the course
Little vs. the course average
A
−25.7
B
+15.2
C
+10.2
D
−0.8
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
7.1% withdrew · 4 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Natalie Marie Peterson 7 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Susan A Zemka 7 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
David Martinez 17 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Annika Armstrong 18 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Katie Little 17 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Christopher Keller Morris 17 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.