Course record ENGL
ENGL 2212
Science Fiction
University of Colorado Boulder
221 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below averageTeresa L Nugent 57 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nugent vs. the course average
A
+35.5
B
−13.2
C
−13.6
D
−5.0
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.66
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.77
Reflection4.77
Respect4.52
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.32
Questions4.69
David R. Glimp 53 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Glimp vs. the course average
A
−7.5
B
+1.2
C
−2.2
D
+4.5
F
+4.0
Difference in percentage points.
7.0% withdrew · 4 of 57 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Benjamin John Robertson 57 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Robertson vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
+6.1
C
+10.9
D
+2.0
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 2 of 59 enrolled.
Overall3.94 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.13
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration2.69
Connection4.26
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.38
Grading3.92
Reflection4.38
Respect4.50
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.48
Questions4.41
Thora Brylowe 54 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brylowe vs. the course average
A
−13.8
B
+6.2
C
+5.0
D
−1.3
F
+3.8
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 4 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Marie Jaquelin Pelzer 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Bronwyn Olstein 39 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Tyler Nevins 41 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration2.75
Connection3.89
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.86
Reflection4.02
Respect4.62
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.30
Questions4.29
Jaquelin Pelzer 5 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback2.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Matthew Austin 17 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Annika Armstrong 17 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.