Course record ENGL

ENGL 2212

Science Fiction

University of Colorado Boulder

221 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average

Professors 16 of 16

Teresa L Nugent 57 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
80.7% A
15.8% B
1.8% C
0.0% D
1.8% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course
Nugent vs. the course average
A +35.5
B −13.2
C −13.6
D −5.0
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 58 enrolled.

David R. Glimp 53 grades · 1 term 2.78GPA
37.7% A
30.2% B
13.2% C
9.4% D
9.4% F

53 letter grades

Compare with the course
Glimp vs. the course average
A −7.5
B +1.2
C −2.2
D +4.5
F +4.0

Difference in percentage points.

7.0% withdrew · 4 of 57 enrolled.

Benjamin John Robertson 57 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
29.8% A
35.1% B
26.3% C
7.0% D
1.8% F

57 letter grades

Compare with the course
Robertson vs. the course average
A −15.4
B +6.1
C +10.9
D +2.0
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 2 of 59 enrolled.

Thora Brylowe 54 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
31.5% A
35.2% B
20.4% C
3.7% D
9.3% F

54 letter grades

Compare with the course
Brylowe vs. the course average
A −13.8
B +6.2
C +5.0
D −1.3
F +3.8

Difference in percentage points.

6.9% withdrew · 4 of 58 enrolled.

Marie Jaquelin Pelzer 1 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Bronwyn Olstein 39 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Tyler Nevins 41 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology3.84
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration2.75
Connection3.89
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.86
Reflection4.02
Respect4.62
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.08
Challenge4.30
Questions4.29
Jaquelin Pelzer 5 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.40
Creativity4.80
Feedback2.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Matthew Austin 17 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Annika Armstrong 17 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Jason Daniel Gladstone 17 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Katie Henze 17 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Amanda L Hurtado 4 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.23
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.93
Contribution4.23
Discussion1.92
Inclusivity2.39
Grading3.30
Reflection5.00
Respect2.69
Creativity5.00
Feedback1.92
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.84
Questions1.85
Morgan Llewellyn 13 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Franklin Mitchell 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
T. J. Mclemore 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.38
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.85
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.