Course record ENGL
ENGL 1700
Introduction to Shakespeare
University of Colorado Boulder
113 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Teresa L Nugent 56 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nugent vs. the course average
A
+9.6
B
−6.1
C
−2.6
D
same
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.88
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.73
Reflection4.88
Respect4.93
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.86
Questions4.95
Dianne Mitchell 57 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mitchell vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+6.0
C
+2.6
D
same
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 3 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
48 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.79
Reflection4.79
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Rob Jackson 35 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Tyler Nevins 24 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Annika Armstrong 20 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.10
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.60
Questions3.80
Jeffrey N Cox 20 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.20
Julia Poetzinger 20 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Grace Donahue 14 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Stacey Leigh Milliken 10 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.01
Contribution4.78
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.57
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.18
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.