Course record ENGL
ENGL 1290
Crime, Policing, Detection
University of Colorado Boulder
455 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Justin Michael Saxby 43 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Saxby vs. the course average
A
+30.4
B
−12.2
C
−11.2
D
−2.6
F
−4.4
Difference in percentage points.
8.5% withdrew · 4 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.82
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.92
Grading3.45
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.42
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.92
Questions4.69
John A Stevenson 114 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
114 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stevenson vs. the course average
A
+14.6
B
−6.0
C
−5.9
D
−2.6
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 2 of 116 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.72
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.17
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.08
Reflection4.65
Respect4.70
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Mary K Klages 110 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
110 letter grades
Compare with the course
Klages vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−5.2
C
+0.6
D
+1.0
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 3 of 113 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.64
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.78
Reflection4.87
Respect4.94
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.91
Questions4.88
William Kuskin 94 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kuskin vs. the course average
A
−14.1
B
+2.6
C
+7.9
D
+1.6
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 5 of 99 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.52
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.63
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Elizabeth Anderman 94 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderman vs. the course average
A
−22.6
B
+16.4
C
+3.7
D
+1.6
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 95 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.34
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.01
Reflection4.51
Respect4.75
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.68
Questions4.78
Mitchell Casey Christensen 18 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Emma Johnson 18 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.10
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.95
Connection3.55
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity3.05
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.55
Questions4.15
Kaige Sellers 15 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Bessie Golding-Ochsner 18 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Katie Henze 29 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.