Course record ENES

ENES 3843

Special Topics

University of Colorado Boulder

139 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score79/100
Strong

Professors 9 of 9

Scot Ray Douglass 40 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

40 letter grades

Compare with the course
Douglass vs. the course average
A +8.6
B −7.9
C −0.7
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

2.4% withdrew · 1 of 41 enrolled.

William Kuskin 26 grades · 1 term 3.95GPA
96.2% A
3.8% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kuskin vs. the course average
A +4.8
B −4.1
C −0.7
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.

Diane Elizabeth Sieber 73 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
84.9% A
13.7% B
1.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

73 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sieber vs. the course average
A −6.4
B +5.8
C +0.7
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 1 of 74 enrolled.

Paul Jordan Diduch 12 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration3.68
Connection4.78
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.14
Reflection4.91
Respect4.91
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.91
Questions4.71
Mark Joseph Kissler 6 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Leland Giovannelli 3 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Angela Lea Thieman Dino 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Sarah Stanford-Mcintyre 12 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
James Steven Byrne 5 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.