Course record ENES

ENES 3100

Ethical Awareness for Engineers

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong

Professors 9 of 9

Alexandre Priou 69 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

69 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology3.54
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.58
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.37
Reflection4.94
Respect4.61
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.94
Questions4.93
Anja K. Lange 142 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

142 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.90
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.37
Reflection4.80
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.66
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.79
Questions4.73
Leland Giovannelli 17 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.54
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.72
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.89
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Andrea Kowalchuk 208 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

208 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.84
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.87
Respect4.89
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.87
Questions4.81
Paul Jordan Diduch 26 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.89
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.49
Reflection4.86
Respect4.82
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.84
Questions4.88
H C F Fredricksmeyer 142 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

142 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.71
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.38
Reflection4.89
Respect4.85
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.87
Questions4.68
Catherine H Ambler 72 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

72 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.55
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.51
Reflection4.84
Respect4.86
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.63
Questions4.89
Lisa Malkanthi De Alwis 29 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.26
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.69
Grading3.89
Reflection4.73
Respect4.59
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.67
Questions4.47
Pedro Asmar De Lucas Brea 73 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

73 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.62
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.61
Reflection4.96
Respect4.91
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.86
Questions4.79
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.