Course record EMUS

EMUS 3317

Concert Band

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score72/100
Strong

Professors 8 of 8

Branden Steinmetz 105 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

105 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.42
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.84
Reflection4.92
Respect4.70
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.77
Questions4.86
Zachariah William Cheever 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Melinda Marie Mason 5 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Francisco Borja-Prieto 29 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Derek Carter Stoughton 28 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Lauren R Milbourn 18 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Logan Sorey 41 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.37
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.62
Reflection4.70
Respect4.88
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.72
Questions4.89
Kirsten Hoogstraten 28 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.42
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.95
Reflection4.85
Respect4.83
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.73
Questions4.85
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.