Course record EMUS
EMUS 1467
World Music Ensemble
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Zane Cupec 1 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mami Itasaka 19 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.49
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.88
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.94
Reflection4.19
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.47
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.56
Questions4.99
Maputo Mensah 29 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology3.45
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.58
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.83
Grading3.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.77
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.53
Questions4.35
I Made Lasmawan 4 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.19
Technology2.24
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.14
Contribution2.23
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.17
Reflection3.15
Respect5.00
Creativity3.17
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.96
Questions4.06
Jay Keister 2 reported responses 2.67Eval / 5
Overall2.67 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion2.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.00
Reflection1.00
Respect3.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.00
Questions2.50
Hugh Frederick Ragin 1 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge4.00
Questions2.00
Johnette Martin 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Atsuko Plampin 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alejandro Castano 1 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.