Course record EMEN
EMEN 5015
Engineering Communication
University of Colorado Boulder
246 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Alex Dietrich 72 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dietrich vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−2.0
C
−0.8
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.68
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.24
Reflection4.67
Respect4.79
Creativity4.43
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.23
Questions4.62
Christie Anne Leopold 36 grades · 1 term 3.98GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Leopold vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−2.0
C
−0.8
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 36 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.35
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.35
Challenge3.80
Questions3.35
Ronald G Duren Jr. 55 grades · 1 term 3.97GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+1.6
C
−0.8
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 1 of 56 enrolled.
Daniel Fuller Moorer Jr. 83 grades · 1 term 3.87GPA
83 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
+1.6
C
+1.6
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 85 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.68
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.39
Grading3.81
Reflection4.75
Respect4.62
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.66
Questions4.62
Allison Rae Dake 20 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.68
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.12
Reflection4.60
Respect4.68
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.63
Questions4.40
Ron Duren Jr 6 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.25
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.65
Ron Duren 16 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.95
Reflection4.15
Respect4.65
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.15
Questions4.35
Todd Jon Mosher 27 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.25
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.35
Reflection4.25
Respect4.28
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.88
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.15
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.