Course record EMEN
EMEN 4100
Engineering Economics
University of Colorado Boulder
950 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score56/100
Mixed record
Anne Victoria Wrobetz 106 grades · 1 term 3.86GPA
106 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wrobetz vs. the course average
A
+10.5
B
−9.0
C
−0.4
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 106 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.92
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.88
Reflection4.68
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.83
Questions4.98
Seth Murray 310 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
310 letter grades
Compare with the course
Murray vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−2.4
C
−3.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.3% withdrew · 1 of 311 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
181 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.22
Connection4.76
Contribution3.83
Discussion4.01
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.17
Reflection4.00
Respect4.58
Creativity4.02
Feedback3.95
Interaction3.78
Challenge4.15
Questions4.44
Christy L Bozic 168 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
168 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bozic vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−1.2
C
−1.2
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 2 of 170 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.66
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.34
Reflection4.59
Respect4.63
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.75
Questions4.78
Michael J Readey 184 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
184 letter grades
Compare with the course
Readey vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−4.4
C
−1.5
D
−0.6
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 185 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.91
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.79
Reflection4.84
Respect4.97
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.77
Questions4.96
John D. Svoboda 62 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Svoboda vs. the course average
A
+1.2
B
+2.4
C
−2.6
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 2 of 64 enrolled.
Overall3.50 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology2.96
Synthesis3.42
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.43
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.65
Grading2.97
Reflection3.50
Respect4.48
Creativity2.92
Feedback2.37
Interaction3.98
Challenge3.53
Questions3.38
Eric Leeker 120 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
120 letter grades
Compare with the course
Leeker vs. the course average
A
−40.2
B
+21.3
C
+14.1
D
+3.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 3 of 123 enrolled.
Overall2.99 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.94
Technology2.87
Synthesis2.94
Collaboration2.19
Connection3.61
Contribution2.41
Discussion2.28
Inclusivity2.20
Grading2.58
Reflection2.83
Respect3.39
Creativity3.16
Feedback2.33
Interaction3.04
Challenge3.03
Questions2.33
Michael J Gazarik 52 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.81
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.64
Reflection4.63
Respect4.67
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.64
Questions4.71
Alex Dietrich 17 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.17
Connection4.31
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.06
Reflection3.65
Respect4.62
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.17
Interaction4.49
Challenge4.03
Questions3.98
Anthony D Songer 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.62
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.81
Respect4.88
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.88
Questions4.69
Todd Jon Mosher 51 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.25
Connection4.58
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity3.85
Grading3.84
Reflection4.21
Respect4.23
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.23
Questions3.91
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.