Course record EMEN
EMEN 3100
Introduction to Engineering Management
University of Colorado Boulder
800 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score61/100
Strong
Ronald G Duren Jr. 28 grades · 1 term 3.92GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Jr. vs. the course average
A
+8.8
B
−9.6
C
+1.2
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Christy L Bozic 200 grades · 1 term 3.89GPA
200 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bozic vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−5.6
C
−0.9
D
same
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 201 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.68
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.61
Reflection4.38
Respect4.84
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.48
Questions4.59
Alex Dietrich 76 grades · 1 term 3.89GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dietrich vs. the course average
A
+7.1
B
−7.0
C
−1.1
D
same
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.75
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.19
Reflection4.53
Respect4.71
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.56
Questions4.66
Kristen Elizabeth Egan 496 grades · 1 term 3.77GPA
496 letter grades
Compare with the course
Egan vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+3.9
C
+0.4
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 10 of 506 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
162 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.69
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.16
Reflection4.53
Respect4.37
Creativity4.31
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.22
Questions3.84
Ron Duren Jr 9 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions3.50
Mark Edwin Rentschler 19 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.98
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.98
Reflection4.71
Respect4.93
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.78
Questions4.35
Amy Moore 23 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.80
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.65
Reflection4.49
Respect4.75
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.52
Claudia Bouvier Steen 15 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.