Course record EDUC

EDUC 5625

Methods of Teaching English Language Development

University of Colorado Boulder

53 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score77/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 12

Deena Alexandra Gumina 26 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

26 letter grades

Compare with the course
Gumina vs. the course average
A +1.9
B same
C −1.9
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.

Lorretta Chavez 27 grades · 1 term 3.90GPA
96.3% A
0.0% B
3.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

27 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chavez vs. the course average
A −1.8
B same
C +1.8
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.

Julia Pappas Lamb 6 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Christina Bernal Sati 9 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.90
Questions4.80
Tamara L Milbourn 11 reported responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.10
Reflection4.10
Respect3.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.50
Ashley Meghan Chrzanowski 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.70
Questions5.00
Kimberly Ann Strong 18 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Deborah Palmer 5 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jody Ann Slavick 19 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Nicole Sager 10 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Show all 12 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.