Course record EDUC
EDUC 4535
Assessment for Bilingual Learners
University of Colorado Boulder
256 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score71/100
Strong
Teresa Marie Warkentin 113 grades · 1 term 3.91GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Warkentin vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
−6.1
C
−0.4
D
+0.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 2 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.78 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.88
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.75
Reflection4.84
Respect4.87
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.74
Questions4.90
Nelia Joan Pena 35 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pena vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+3.7
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.77
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.30
Reflection4.54
Respect4.88
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.54
Questions4.73
Alison Gould Boardman 73 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Boardman vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+8.6
C
+1.0
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 1 of 74 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.32
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.12
Reflection4.32
Respect4.51
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.13
Questions4.51
Caitlin Gailey B Mcc Fine 35 grades · 1 term 3.73GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fine vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−2.0
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.79
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.52
Reflection4.74
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.77
Questions4.68
Silvia Nogueron-Liu 12 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Lindsay E Romano 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.