Course record EDUC

EDUC 3321

Literacy in the Elementary Classroom 2

University of Colorado Boulder

195 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2022–2026
Flunk Score84/100
Excellent

Professors 10 of 10

Kristen Driscoll 101 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

101 letter grades

Compare with the course
Driscoll vs. the course average
A +0.5
B −0.5
C same
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 101 enrolled.

Emily Yerkes 46 grades · 1 term 3.99GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Yerkes vs. the course average
A +0.5
B −0.5
C same
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 46 enrolled.

Elizabeth Dutro 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

16 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.

Olivia Jackson Cox 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.99GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

21 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 21 enrolled.

Stephen Adam Crawley 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
90.9% A
9.1% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

11 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 11 enrolled.

Emily Grace Johns-O'Leary 31 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.75
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Lizz Tetu 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Paula Bernal 17 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.90
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions4.10
Silvia Nogueron-Liu 15 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Helen Baynum 12 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.