Course record EDUC
EDUC 2800
Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score78/100
Strong
Wendy Jean Glenn 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Michele D Simpson 58 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.49
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.55
Reflection4.89
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.96
Enrique J Lopez 6 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Tafadzwa Godwill Tivaringe 6 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Alphonse Keasley 2 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Erica Schomer 13 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.86
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.62
Reflection4.96
Respect4.84
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.48
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.72
Questions4.94
Abigail Erin Strusz 25 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.86
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.48
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.84
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions4.86
Bailey P Albrecht 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Gabrielle Joleene Jutte 6 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.93
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.77
Reflection4.93
Respect5.00
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.93
Questions4.93
Cherell M Johnson 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.