Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record ECON
ECON 4848
Applied Econometrics
University of Colorado Boulder
456 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Terra Greenw Mckinnish-Harllee 35 grades · 1 term 2.95GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mckinnish-Harllee vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
+1.4
C
+3.1
D
−6.4
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.65
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.31
Reflection4.55
Respect4.58
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.55
Questions4.53
Chrystie Burr 59 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Burr vs. the course average
A
+8.9
B
−4.6
C
−4.6
D
+2.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 2 of 61 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.08
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.90
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.42
Reflection4.57
Respect4.74
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.22
Questions4.61
Daniel Thomas Kaffine 33 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaffine vs. the course average
A
−10.6
B
+27.5
C
−13.1
D
−6.4
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
8.3% withdrew · 3 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.53
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.09
Reflection4.45
Respect4.98
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.61
Questions4.90
Jennifer Lynn Klein 183 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
183 letter grades
Compare with the course
Klein vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
−2.2
C
+4.0
D
−0.9
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 3 of 186 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
167 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.30
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.74
Reflection4.46
Respect4.66
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.59
Questions4.82
Mahdieh Yazdani 122 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
122 letter grades
Compare with the course
Yazdani vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
−0.5
C
−2.9
D
+4.3
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 8 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.70
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.18
Reflection4.72
Respect4.70
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.74
Questions4.66
Brian C Cadena 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.87GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
7.7% withdrew · 2 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Brian Christopher Marein 46 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.44
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.08
Reflection4.54
Respect4.86
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.52
Questions4.56
Loren D Kruschke 69 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.22
Connection4.68
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.30
Reflection4.58
Respect4.65
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.37
Questions4.82
Lauren Schechter 22 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.50
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions4.55
Ge Song 63 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.45
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.74
Reflection4.60
Respect4.57
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.61
Questions4.72
Course documents
Syllabi 5
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi
Fall 2024 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Spring 2024 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.