Course record ECON

ECON 3535

Natural Resource Economics

University of Colorado Boulder

619 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 18

Matthew Gerald Burgess 321 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
36.4% A
40.8% B
16.8% C
2.8% D
3.1% F

321 letter grades

Compare with the course
Burgess vs. the course average
A +6.1
B −0.1
C −4.5
D −1.7
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 9 of 330 enrolled.

Kyle F Butts 175 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
27.4% A
41.1% B
22.3% C
6.3% D
2.9% F

175 letter grades

Compare with the course
Butts vs. the course average
A −2.9
B +0.3
C +1.0
D +1.8
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.9% withdrew · 9 of 184 enrolled.

Sean Holland Strunk 55 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
21.8% A
34.5% B
34.5% C
9.1% D
0.0% F

55 letter grades

Compare with the course
Strunk vs. the course average
A −8.6
B −6.3
C +13.2
D +4.6
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 2 of 57 enrolled.

Kevin Wayne Starnes 68 grades · 1 term 2.62GPA
16.2% A
45.6% B
29.4% C
4.4% D
4.4% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course
Starnes vs. the course average
A −14.2
B +4.7
C +8.1
D −0.1
F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

12.8% withdrew · 10 of 78 enrolled.

Diana Dorman 41 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

41 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.20
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Brian Christopher Marein 26 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.00
Ashley Dancer 29 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.40
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.90
Questions4.60
Xiaomeng Zhao 34 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Chad Allan Brown 39 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Joseph Patrick Fry 35 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

35 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Show all 18 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.