Course record ECEN
ECEN 3250
Microelectronics
University of Colorado Boulder
402 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Joshua Combes 45 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Combes vs. the course average
A
+12.4
B
−6.7
C
+4.0
D
−6.5
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.02
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.56
Reflection4.05
Respect5.00
Creativity4.91
Feedback3.18
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.88
Questions4.91
Prachi Sharma 45 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sharma vs. the course average
A
+14.6
B
same
C
−13.8
D
−2.0
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 2 of 47 enrolled.
Juliet T Gopinath 192 grades · 1 term 2.64GPA
192 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gopinath vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
+0.2
C
+1.0
D
+1.9
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 8 of 200 enrolled.
Overall4.33 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.05
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity3.08
Grading3.97
Reflection4.14
Respect4.51
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.09
Challenge4.46
Questions4.23
Wounjhang Park 110 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
110 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+2.2
C
+2.9
D
−0.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 4 of 114 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.52
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration3.04
Connection4.17
Contribution3.71
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.84
Grading3.71
Reflection4.37
Respect4.57
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.59
Interaction3.76
Challenge4.59
Questions4.49
Andrew Joseph Affrunti 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.87GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.06
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.72
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.14
Reflection4.89
Respect4.82
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.72
Questions4.74
Luca Corradini 20 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Dragan Maksimovic 77 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.