Course record EBIO
EBIO 6100
Seminar in Environmental Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score63/100
Strong
Alexandra P Rose 23 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.82
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.32
Reflection4.74
Respect4.84
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.72
Questions4.83
Nolan Coburn Kane 22 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.93
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.99
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jingchun Li 17 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.76
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.42
Reflection4.85
Respect4.94
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.76
Questions4.94
Rebecca J Safran 17 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.76
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.42
Reflection4.85
Respect4.61
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.78
Questions4.92
Nichole Nannette Barger 14 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.92
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.88
Reflection4.85
Respect4.92
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Katharine M Nash 5 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Steve Schmidt 1 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Stacey Dewitt Smith 4 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Noah Fierer 17 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.03
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.94
Grading3.92
Reflection4.38
Respect4.43
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.21
Questions4.55
Samuel Allen Ramsey 36 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.84
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.77
Reflection4.67
Respect4.94
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.81
Questions4.12
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.