Course record EBIO
EBIO 3590
Plants and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
98 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score62/100
Strong
Elizabeth L Paulson 25 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paulson vs. the course average
A
−3.4
B
+6.7
C
−4.2
D
+3.0
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.
Stacey Dewitt Smith 50 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
50 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
−1.3
C
+1.8
D
−1.0
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.68
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.90
Reflection4.51
Respect4.63
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.80
Questions4.82
Lucas C Wheeler 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.62GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Daniela Vergara 8 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Sukuan Liu 9 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.95
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.32
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.63
Questions4.95
Anna Isabel Spiers 4 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Chelsea Pretz 6 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Abbey Paulson 19 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Zach Marcus 7 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Seth Raynor 9 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.05
Contribution4.35
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.15
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.05
Questions3.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.