Course record EBIO

EBIO 3400

Microbiology

University of Colorado Boulder

787 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Catherine Alisha Quandt 481 grades · 1 term 3.12GPA
44.9% A
32.4% B
13.9% C
6.0% D
2.7% F

481 letter grades

Compare with the course
Quandt vs. the course average
A +0.8
B −1.1
C +0.2
D +0.7
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 14 of 495 enrolled.

Teresa Bilinski 306 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
42.8% A
35.3% B
13.4% C
4.2% D
4.2% F

306 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bilinski vs. the course average
A −1.3
B +1.7
C −0.3
D −1.1
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 11 of 317 enrolled.

Kristin G Swihart 170 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

170 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.41
Connection4.41
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity3.84
Grading3.99
Reflection4.05
Respect4.29
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.91
Questions4.31
Steve Schmidt 269 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

269 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology3.64
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.57
Contribution3.74
Discussion3.83
Inclusivity3.87
Grading3.75
Reflection3.93
Respect4.40
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.14
Challenge3.94
Questions4.09
Kyle Samuel Schutz 75 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

75 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.94
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.80
Reflection4.62
Respect4.97
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Darlynn Rachel Korns 9 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.91
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.75
Reflection4.86
Respect4.95
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.93
Alisha Quandt 210 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

210 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration3.53
Connection4.57
Contribution3.74
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.20
Reflection3.93
Respect4.67
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.35
Questions4.35
Sallie Jane Tucker 44 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

44 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Sierra Dawn Jech 58 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Mary Childress 56 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

56 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.