Course record EBIO

EBIO 3040

Conservation Biology

University of Colorado Boulder

208 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score45/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Tracy Halward 58 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
65.5% A
22.4% B
8.6% C
1.7% D
1.7% F

58 letter grades

Compare with the course
Halward vs. the course average
A +13.1
B −13.6
C −0.5
D +0.8
F +0.3

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 1 of 59 enrolled.

Joanna E Lambert 91 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
54.9% A
35.2% B
7.7% C
0.0% D
2.2% F

91 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lambert vs. the course average
A +2.5
B −0.9
C −1.4
D −1.0
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

5.2% withdrew · 5 of 96 enrolled.

Christina M Alba 59 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
35.6% A
50.8% B
11.9% C
1.7% D
0.0% F

59 letter grades

Compare with the course
Alba vs. the course average
A −16.8
B +14.8
C +2.7
D +0.7
F −1.4

Difference in percentage points.

4.8% withdrew · 3 of 62 enrolled.

Emily Beam 16 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.77
Grading3.77
Reflection4.57
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.47
Questions4.40
Claire Karban 19 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.83
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.03
Reflection4.67
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.43
Questions4.63
Katie Williams 8 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Amir Dehbi 15 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.93
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.37
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.17
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Abbey Paulson 67 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

67 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Skylar Montana Lynch 11 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Etienne Rouby 16 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.10
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.