Course record EBIO
EBIO 3010
Teaching Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score83/100
Excellent
Ambika Kamath 2 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Teresa Bilinski 11 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.99
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Caitlin Anne Kelly 6 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.77
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.88
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.93
Questions4.93
Derek Michael Sweeney 29 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.67
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.09
Reflection4.96
Respect4.99
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.97
Questions4.32
Kendi F Davies 24 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.71
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.71
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.71
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.71
Challenge5.00
Questions4.71
Laura Dee 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Brett Andrew Melbourne 2 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Lisa Cutting Auchincloss 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Stephanie Kathryn Polutchko 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Andrew Martin 16 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.41
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.